>"I think then it fulfills the role I intended, as actual consequences of misinformation." How so? I am skeptical, but what actual negative consequences have r

>"I think then it fulfills the role I intended, as actual consequences of misinformation." How so? I am skeptical, but what actual negative consequences have resulted from this? >"That seems like dangerous amounts of cover for any topic where bringing them up is automatically discounted." Do you likewise feel the urge discount any story that brings up Antifa? I do. It is because in the minds of most partisans they loom larger than their real life impact. While QAnons and Antifa are completely different, they are utilized as boogeymen by ideologically motivated reporters. Still, the mention of these two groups only serve to raise my skepticism level rather than make me outright deny everything around their mention.