3 ms·
From the comment section: https://twitter.com/dnunan79/status/1491073564447244288/photo/1 https://twitter.com/dnunan79/status/1491073564447244288/phot... It i
by pelasaco 5y ago
From the comment section:
https://twitter.com/dnunan79/status/1491073564447244288/photo/1 https://twitter.com/dnunan79/status/1491073564447244288/phot...
It is interesting, how the concept of misinformation is bound to time. Imagine 1 year ago, somebody would say:
"if you are vaccinated, you are still able to catch covid and spread covid", or
"cloth masks don't work", or even the first "misinformation" from the whole pandemic
"covid was leaked from a Lab in Wuhan"
All those 3 "misinformation" and many more were policed pretty hard until 2021.. Today 2022, they were either proved to be true or have high probability to be true.
- pelasaco 5y agogetting down-voted because... ?
- memish 5y ago
- ignoramous 5y ago> It is interesting, how the concept of misinformation is bound to time. Imagine 1 year ago, somebody would say: "covid was leaked from a Lab in Wuhan"... Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proofs, and that once that proof was evident, it was then safe to assume it was no longer a case of disinformation. Of course there are two sides to this: What if the 'covid leaked from a lab in Wuhan' datum was so angrily suppressed that the requisite extraordinary proofs were never unearthed, or worse, destroyed... then the probable truth may have never seen the light of the day. Thankfully, in this case, that didn't happen.