4 ms·
>You don't need to do wacky things... A function call in a for loop's conditional doesn't fit your definition of wacky?
by cbs 15y ago
>You don't need to do wacky things...
A function call in a for loop's conditional doesn't fit your definition of wacky?
- gsg 15y agoA bit suspicious, maybe? I was trying to suggest the unsigned issue without actually spelling it out, not anything to do with side effects. I probably should have used sizeof, even though that doesn't make sense there.
- qntm 15y agoA function call in a for loop's conditional is practically C best practice. K&R do it on almost every page.
- Locke1689 15y agoThey usually only do it for builtins (e.g., strlen) and const functions, which makes this example a lot safer.