3 ms·
Now you are moving goalposts. 'strong legal ground' yet the Supreme Court disagreed with you. You can posit about the future all you want, it won't change the
by effingwewt 5y ago
Now you are moving goalposts.
'strong legal ground' yet the Supreme Court disagreed with you.
You can posit about the future all you want, it won't change the reality of the present.
Now I no longer believe you are commenting in good faith, you are simply pushing an agenda.
- throwaway6734 5y agohttps://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/197/11/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/197/11/ State level mandates are considered to be constitutional, it's the broad federal mandate without employment specialization that wasn't considered constitutional. This isn't moving goal posts but providing context.