4 ms·
Not deanonymise, no. Come up with a way for siteops to block someone and all their sockpuppet accounts, without knowing the underlying identity, and you’ll bec
by floatingatoll 5y ago
Not deanonymise, no.
Come up with a way for siteops to block someone and all their sockpuppet accounts, without knowing the underlying identity, and you’ll become a billionaire.
Without that, the only option we have today is deanonymization, which is a terrible option. We ought to do better.
- zozbot234 5y agoIt's really just a matter of balancing the difficulty of creating a new "identity", so that legitimate users can occasionally use multiple identities to partition their traffic and make it harder to get doxxed, but are still deterred from creating identities cheaply to engage in sybil attacks or escape blocks. There are various ways of committing real-world resources to an identity to deter such abuse. Actual meatspace identity is of course one way of doing this, but there are probably others.
- floatingatoll 5y agoThat’s all plausible sounding, but no one’s connected the dots and done it yet. We’re still at “step 2: ???”.
- jbentham 5y agoWhat you are assuming is possible is a logical contradiction. To be able to recognise two persons as being the same is in fact the definition of de-anonymisation. Please check your math.
- paxys 5y agoIt is not a contradiction. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-knowledge_proof https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-knowledge_proof as a somewhat similar example.
- floatingatoll 5y agoI'm not restricting my considerations to "the technology that is implemented and available to Tor users today", given that what's available neither meets the needs of sites, nor the needs of users. If you think that the idea is inappropriate, please state so and make your case for why you believe in your viewpoint. If you think that the idea is impossible, please note why you believe that — and then consider the idea as if it were possible.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]