4 ms·
"My personal guess is that we’ll achieve Full Self-Driving this year at a safety level significantly greater than a person." Is this even remotely possible?
by tejohnso 5y ago
"My personal guess is that we’ll achieve Full Self-Driving this year at a safety level significantly greater than a person."
Is this even remotely possible?
- porbelm 5y agoNo, especially not with using only camera vision AI and not going the LIDAR route.
- loa_in_ 5y agoIt's possible but the erratic path we're taking to this goal makes me worry we'll miss it, and the next shot at this will be in few generations
- FireBeyond 5y agoIt's not possible. Not this year. And fearmongering like this - "We have to keep trying, otherwise it'll be regulated out of existence and we'll have to wait generations" is absolutely uncalled for. It's being regulated because people like Musk value their cars, sorry, "asset class" more than they do about the risks that they are taking.
- thaway2839 5y ago[flagged]
- camjohnson26 5y agoIt’s absolutely not possible, and I think he’s crossed the Rubicon into full scale fraud at this point. There’s plenty of videos out there showing just basic failures of the system. Last week a popular Youtuber ran into a pylon on it while making a video. It was a simple right turn with great visibility and no traffic, but the system still couldn’t prevent it. Could have been a person. This Twitter post documents how many times Musk has promised FSD is coming “next year.” https://twitter.com/BS__Exposed/status/1482465346061848583?s=20&t=Lqg0TR2cwgMXP-GmV1a_iw https://twitter.com/BS__Exposed/status/1482465346061848583?s...
- tejohnso 5y agoThat's what I was thinking. At what point do statements like this from a CEO constitute fraud? Especially given the historic record. I suppose if there isn't sufficient and directly attributable damage done, it's not going to be pursued.