3 ms·
> Most often they are in the form of bus systems, and the routes, frequency of routes and location of stops make it very clear what the purpose of the system ac
by alamortsubite 5y ago
> Most often they are in the form of bus systems, and the routes, frequency of routes and location of stops make it very clear what the purpose of the system actually is.
Yes, of course. A naive person might think that city budgets were the issue, but "focused on getting poor people to work" is doubtless the mission statement for each of these concrete flyover state examples (outside Chicago). I agree and it's really sad, because if you have the political will and finances to send a crappy bus by a tilting signpost once an hour, surely you can whip up a tram network to rival Melbourne or Budapest's.
- indymike 5y ago> I agree and it's really sad, because if you have the political will and finances to send a crappy bus by a tilting signpost once an hour, surely you can whip up a tram network to rival Melbourne or Budapest's. This is very true. There are probably 20 cities in the US that are decent public transit away from going from ~1M population to 4-5M population, with all the opportunities (and problems) that go with growth. It's really sad, because the just continue to sprawl and sprawl, and quality of life goes down with congestion on the beltway.