3 ms·
I'm not sure whether providing an easy fallback is the right way to go. I'm not even sure whether providing any fallback at all is a good idea. Face it: Either
by pilif 15y ago
I'm not sure whether providing an easy fallback is the right way to go. I'm not even sure whether providing any fallback at all is a good idea.
Face it: Either you are convinced of the UI that you just created or you are not. If you are and if you are sure that it's very easy to learn for a novice user, then there's no reason to provide the fallback because wether the user is a novice or an old user - in any case, the new UI will work better, so users are better off.
Providing a fallback puts a burden on you and other developers which now have to test the application in both modes (assuming the application works in both modes - like in gnome/unity).
On the other hand though, if you believe that what you have done isn't absolutely perfect, then better not change anything and refine your work until it really is perfect.
Providing a fallback is the same thing as the dreaded "I'm an expert user"-buttons the overly complicated UIs of the late 90ies were providing.
- dimitar 15y agoThe GNOME 3 fallback is comparable to windows safe-mode: - video effects disabled - is supposed to be used when correcting problems - there aren't any improvements to it - no desktop icons, no panel applets. Just the necessities. So it isn't really a compromise in vision or a competing interface.