> I think being a free speech quasi-absolutist is the only viable position I disagree. I think that deplatforming Alex Jones is probably a good idea, and depl

> I think being a free speech quasi-absolutist is the only viable position I disagree. I think that deplatforming Alex Jones is probably a good idea, and deplatforming JRE is probably a bad idea. If I could choose, I'd deplatform one but not the other. I think that's a perfectly consistent point of view to hold. The line has to be drawn somewhere - but I don't know why it can't be at a nuanced place in between these two.