> A "reinterpretation"? That's not what a book editor does. I know! You’re the one that made the stupid argument about book editors and I told you at the time

> A "reinterpretation"? That's not what a book editor does. I know! You’re the one that made the stupid argument about book editors and I told you at the time that wasn’t what a book editor did. > Drama, by definition is a specific type of fiction. So how can non-fiction works be dramatized and remain non-fiction? You say that and then go on to say absolute truth doesn’t exist and if you ask people the same question twice you get a different version of the truth. Literally contradicting your opening sentence. > It looks like I'm doing a better job than yourself of keeping track of what you've said. You’re either incredibly piss poor at reading comprehension or just trolling. I’m assuming the former given conversing with you has been like trying to hold a debate with someone who’s suffering from severe mental trauma. You repeatedly contradict yourself (sometimes in the same post), build up entire arguments around some subtext you’ve derived and then refuse to move past that even when it’s pointed out that you’re completely in the wrong. Either way, this could have been an interesting discussion where you presented why you might recommend the Bible but instead it’s been a frustrating affair of you demonstrating how some people are incapable or reading any form of texts. With that in mind I’m going to terminate our conversation here because we are just going round in circles with yourself repeatedly missing the mark at every opportunity.