3 ms·
This book is just brilliant. It was actually originally written in 1978. For me, it's in the same league as "The Mythical Man-Month". Right now, I am wrestling
by stevesimmons 5y ago
This book is just brilliant. It was actually originally written in 1978. For me, it's in the same league as "The Mythical Man-Month".
Right now, I am wrestling with exactly the same issues: designing data structures for representing real-world entities, discovering the roles they play (in a financial decision in my case), gathering data about the entities (depending on their roles), confirming the relationships between them, and validating attributes about them, based on primary data with differing degrees of reliability.
I've been through various iterations, painfully getting better at representing "what is true and what don't we know yet".
Reading "Data and Reality" just now was like a distillation of my endeavour, all in one place. Plus lots of things I haven't properly considered yet.
I can see why many people find it dull: if you haven't struggled with representing these distinctions yourself, it can well sounds like pointless nitpicking and overcomplicating straightforward situations.
So a big thank you to the original poster, Tomte.
- stevesimmons 5y agoComing back a day later, now that I've finished "Data and Reality", to say the very last pages of the book are "About Bill Kent". In particular, it gives a reference to Bill's web site http://www.bkent.net http://www.bkent.net, which includes a list of his personal and academic [1] writing over 35 years. I was actually astonished to find his web site still running, 17 years after his death in 2005. How many of our own digital artefacts will have such longevity? [1] http://www.bkent.net/catalogsource.htm http://www.bkent.net/catalogsource.htm