4 ms·
These effects are technically present but negligible for all practical purposes (well, unless you're building the next Gravity Probe B). The geodetic precession
by panda-giddiness 5y ago
These effects are technically present but negligible for all practical purposes (well, unless you're building the next Gravity Probe B). The geodetic precession for a satellite in polar LEO is roughly 1 deg per 500 years [1]; the other types are orders of magnitude smaller.
You've made a good point, however, that two of these types of precession are evidence that the Earth spins (whether you could convince a flat-Earther of Thomas precession is a separate matter). But let me offer a gentle correction: Thomas and Lense-Thirring precessions are caused by the rotation of the Earth, whereas the geodetic precession is merely caused by the presence of a central mass.
---
[1] Gravity Probe B final report: https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.3456 https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.3456
- pdonis 5y ago> Thomas and Lense-Thirring precessions are caused by the rotation of the Earth, whereas the geodetic precession is merely caused by the presence of a central mass. Oops, yes, I misstated this. Thanks for the correction!