> My reference.. No worries. I assumed you must have meant something like that. > I am, however, aware of the scale of what I am proposing… For smaller citie

> My reference.. No worries. I assumed you must have meant something like that. > I am, however, aware of the scale of what I am proposing… For smaller cities I could see how this might work if it’s done before they really develop. I was thinking in terms of existing large cities, where it seems intractable in part due to the existing sprawl. I can’t imagine how this would play out in Seattle (where I live) because the sprawl is already well outside the control of the city. Even if Seattle wanted to do this, all of the land is under the control of the surrounding towns (Bellevue, Kirkland, Shoreline, etc.) at this point.