4 ms·

the world would be better if more companies were able or daring enough to fight bullshit patents directly (with prior art, obviousness, etc defenses). but inst

by rrss 5y ago

the world would be better if more companies were able or daring enough to fight bullshit patents directly (with prior art, obviousness, etc defenses). but instead every company chooses to defend themselves by deluging the patent office with more crap, and collective abuse of the patent system to patent stuff even the “inventor” thinks is obvious becomes accepted totally normal behavior.

paxys 5y ago
"The world would be a lot better if <very large group of people/companies> independently did xyz" can be applied to pretty much anything. Except tragedy of the commons is a real thing, and this is why you need governments to step in and regulate.
- rrss 5y ago
  yes, you are right. meaningful voluntary collective change is unlikely. however, i believe that individuals should respect the commons, and don’t believe in the tragedy of the commons as an excuse for individual actions that contribute to the problem. (insert starfish on the beach story)
  - erosenbe0 5y ago
    Well employees could stage a walk out as they do for other causes because the abuse of property rights costs the American economy, worker, and consumer and forces employees to participate in these unethical abuses.
IgorPartola 5y ago
Story time. I worked for a company who did prior art on something that was frankly fucking to obvious and is now ubiquitous (but as far as I know we did it first). At one point a patent troll sued us. Our clients were on our side and one of them (a very prestigious law school that rhymes with Barvard), offered their resources to help us fight the troll. The C level management decided to not risk it and just paid the troll. We were a 20 person company at the time and it wasn’t worth it I guess.
jamesfinlayson 5y ago
I think Alibaba did this a little while ago - someone tried to sue them for infringing a one-click checkout patent and they did challenge them in court and won.

by rrss 5y ago

paxys 5y ago

"The world would be a lot better if <very large group of people/companies> independently did xyz" can be applied to pretty much anything. Except tragedy of the commons is a real thing, and this is why you need governments to step in and regulate.

rrss 5y ago
yes, you are right. meaningful voluntary collective change is unlikely. however, i believe that individuals should respect the commons, and don’t believe in the tragedy of the commons as an excuse for individual actions that contribute to the problem. (insert starfish on the beach story)
- erosenbe0 5y ago
  Well employees could stage a walk out as they do for other causes because the abuse of property rights costs the American economy, worker, and consumer and forces employees to participate in these unethical abuses.

IgorPartola 5y ago

Story time. I worked for a company who did prior art on something that was frankly fucking to obvious and is now ubiquitous (but as far as I know we did it first). At one point a patent troll sued us. Our clients were on our side and one of them (a very prestigious law school that rhymes with Barvard), offered their resources to help us fight the troll. The C level management decided to not risk it and just paid the troll. We were a 20 person company at the time and it wasn’t worth it I guess.

jamesfinlayson 5y ago

I think Alibaba did this a little while ago - someone tried to sue them for infringing a one-click checkout patent and they did challenge them in court and won.