3 ms·
This would be a valid point if the account in question did anything but post CCP apologia and parrot the latest talking points of the party. An example of a com
by evgen 5y ago
This would be a valid point if the account in question did anything but post CCP apologia and parrot the latest talking points of the party. An example of a commenting history that does not get you immediately dismissed as a CCP drone would be something like your relatively new account, which mixes this CCP party-line support with random bits of Seattle commentary and a soupçon of 'big tech is bad' agitation.
If it quacks like a duck we are not really going to be surprised if it tries to fly.
- friedturkey 5y agoYeah, just like anyone who openly mentions they worked for Facebook should ever be trusted under any circumstances. And we all know what "cybersecurity" means after a stint with that company. This is a dumb game to play. Absolute brain worms to think anyone against your ideas is a shill.
- rthomas6 5y agoNo, just this one. All you have to do is look at the comment history and see for yourself.
- evgen 5y agoThis is a useless game to play only if you lack the critical thinking skills necessary to notice that the account in question does nothing but parrot CCP talking points. There is a difference between casual disagreement and simple propaganda accounts, but it does not surprise me that some people are unable to distinguish between the two.