3 ms·
To me it makes intuitive sense that -- at the lowest QoS setting -- a chip in a laptop would be tuned to a lower power draw than a chip in an always-plugged-in
by jmull 5y ago
To me it makes intuitive sense that -- at the lowest QoS setting -- a chip in a laptop would be tuned to a lower power draw than a chip in an always-plugged-in desktop.
Not that I'm sure if that's what's happening here. But if so, it seems consistent that the lappy would be slower than the desktop.
- olliej 5y agoit looks like the scheduler is saying tasks with low priority QoS will only run on the ecores. The high end M1's have half the ecores, apparently clocked faster, but at half the cores it would need them to be more than twice the clock. Thus sadness ensues :D