3 ms·
> Household slaves could buy their freedom from their masters. Then they became freedmen, still allied and somewhat subordinated to their former masters, but t
by tablespoon 5y ago
> Household slaves could buy their freedom from their masters. Then they became freedmen, still allied and somewhat subordinated to their former masters, but their children were already full Roman citizens.
And that may not have been the perk it's sometimes made out to be:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_ancient_Rome https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_ancient_Rome
> However, the master could arrange that slaves would only have enough money to buy their freedom when they were too old to work. They could then use the money to buy a new young slave while the old slave, unable to work, would be forced to rely on charity to stay alive.[62]
- inglor_cz 5y agoOh yes, slavery sucks regardless of time and place. And we haven't even touched the fate of non-household slaves. Agricultural slaves, much more numerous than household slaves, had back-breaking work, but at least somewhat survivable. Slaves sent to the mines or to the galleys (rowing ships) rarely survived for more than three years. It was basically a delayed death sentence.