4 ms·

Thanks, I think having a "read more" would be helpful. You do a good job of quickly demonstrating performance with some numbers, but there's nothing about secur

Thanks, I think having a "read more" would be helpful. You do a good job of quickly demonstrating performance with some numbers, but there's nothing about security on there. I think it'd go a long way for people like me who are going to be immediately skeptical of software in C claiming to be safe.

nderjung 5y ago
Thanks for the feedback, we're in the process of adding a security section[0] which will detail more on the on-goings, but we'll work on adding more highlights on the main page. I need to highlight we have separate research[1][2] which will make its way upstream soon which aims to provide hardening between internal libraries (e.g. isolating the network stack or scheduler) using gates like Intel MPK or separate hardware-accelerated services. [0]: https://github.com/unikraft/docs/pull/32 https://github.com/unikraft/docs/pull/32 [1]: https://project-flexos.github.io/ https://project-flexos.github.io/ [2]: https://github.com/project-flexos/unikraft https://github.com/project-flexos/unikraft
- staticassertion 5y ago
  Pretty cool, will definitely read through that.