4 ms·
> Aren’t you doing exactly what everyone else wants to do? Mansion in the Sticks for me, but City Shacks for thee? I'm hoping to be one of these people one day
by mabbo 5y ago
> Aren’t you doing exactly what everyone else wants to do? Mansion in the Sticks for me, but City Shacks for thee?
I'm hoping to be one of these people one day, but I'm also hoping to be taxed appropriately for it. Make people who cost society so much pay taxes to cover their costs.
And until then, stop taxing my condo in the city as if I'm the same as the 4 bedroom house on a 1/4 acre lot down the street.
- dpark 5y ago> And until then, stop taxing my condo in the city as if I'm the same as the 4 bedroom house on a 1/4 acre lot down the street. Taxes are based on ability to pay rather than actual cost to the city (land value is just a proxy for ability to pay). Otherwise poor people literally could not live in the city. I'm not saying it's a bad idea to impose higher taxes on residences that have outsized infrastructure costs. But I'm not sure I see it as likely. (Or necessary, given that a city willing to do this could just as easily change zoning and suddenly there would be lots of pressure for those single family homes to turn into condos.)
- frenchy 5y agoI can't imagine poor people affording what would presumably be higher taxes in sprawling suburbs (though perhaps the issue is that there are suburbs in the middle of your city?). Of course, taxing people based off their cost while also forbidding densification would just be a sick joke.
- lupire 5y agosurburbs are low tax because they are built using bad debt for future generations to bankrupt on.
- pnutjam 5y agoOne is taxed too low, but it's not the condo.