I looked into the case with Maddie, and it seems like there is NO published information on this case substantiating the claims made by her and her mother. Why i

I looked into the case with Maddie, and it seems like there is NO published information on this case substantiating the claims made by her and her mother. Why is that? -- Kids have gotten sick from the vaccine - but a lot more kids have gotten sick due to Covid. You obviously feel very strongly about this, but no I don't see any evidence anywhere here that there was any intentional wrongdoing. > Is it a problem, yes or no, that the adverse events that could be reported by participants in at least the Pfizer mRNA clinical trial for 12-15 year olds limited what could be reported by highly specifically creating a relatively short list of relatively minor potential adverse events? Yes or no? It is hard to parse some of what you're saying, but what I think you're saying is is it bad that the app only permitted selection of certain things. First, I don't know this is true. I haven't: 1) Seen the app 2) Seen multiple people talking about the app 3) Seen other apps used for similar trials From what I know of end-users of software, and also what I know about parents and people who are politically motivated, I have a lot of skepticism about the claims in the video. Note I said skepticism, not that they are lying. I am skeptical. I don't know if this claim is true. But, let's assume it is true. There is another list of things I don't know: 1) Were there other ways to report these effects? 2) Is there a clinical reason why the app would be designed this way? 3) What else don't I know that should stop me from jumping to a really big conclusion? (that the entire world is in on some vaccine conspiracy). Even if the answer is definitively "the app was designed to limit selection of adverse effects of the vaccine during the trial" there is a set of other things that I just don't know: 1) Was the app designed this way intentionally, or was it a consequence of poor planning? Or a bad software team? Again, being familiar with software, I'm skeptical that if we get this far (see all my previous points...) it was intentional 2) What else don't we know that we can't get from a ten minute video? Your claims are remarkable - they need to be remarkably substantiated, and you're not doing that. You're being a classic conspiracy theorist, just like I said in my first comment.