It boils down to a risk assessment. The fact is people interested in cheating continue to escalate the norm. That's the arms race. Meanwhile we are letting s

It boils down to a risk assessment. The fact is people interested in cheating continue to escalate the norm. That's the arms race. Meanwhile we are letting shady companies illegally spy on users [0] and mine crypto [1], for what? What is the gain? What is the value proposition of kernel-level drivers in the anti-cheat application? What's more, the average gamer doesn't know anything about computers. How can they be expected to make an informed decision about whether or not they should buy a game with kernel-level anticheat if they don't know what that means? Even worse, there is no legal requirement that a game's marketing material say anything about its anti-cheat implementation. These aren't tin-foil hat concerns, these are the enablers of real scandals that have happened and are happening. 0. https://www.wired.com/story/kernel-anti-cheat-online-gaming-vulnerabilities https://www.wired.com/story/kernel-anti-cheat-online-gaming-... 1. https://play.esea.net/forums/492152 https://play.esea.net/forums/492152