4 ms·
I think that strengthens the point, don't you? Deep blue could beat humans a long time ago, and it's still the case that computers don't need humans to play che
by grey-area 5y ago
I think that strengthens the point, don't you? Deep blue could beat humans a long time ago, and it's still the case that computers don't need humans to play chess, and play it better than humans do.
- CrazyStat 5y ago> Deep blue could beat humans a long time ago Yes > and it's still the case that computers don't need humans to play chess, Sure, I guess > and play it better than humans do. In the sense that they can beat humans in a 1v1, yes. But none of that is relevant to the original claim, which is that a human in the loop makes a computer play worse--i.e., that human+computer is worse than computer alone. This claim is false, as the ICCF championship demonstrates each year.