> The personal attacks you keep repeating is that I'm arguing that others should work for me and that I shouldn't have to work This is not a personal attack. I

> The personal attacks you keep repeating is that I'm arguing that others should work for me and that I shouldn't have to work This is not a personal attack. It's literally what you have said. The following are direct quotes: "why should I have to work?"[0]. "we would then ask farmers to give us food in exchange for nothing at all? Sure."[1] If you don't believe that the things you say are the points of your argument, then I agree one or both of us are wasting our time. > Even if wilderness and unused farmland existed in abundance taking advantage of it requires you to disconnect from society. It is not feasible to live that way. > Societies in general do not exist on macro scales. I don't understand. If you're saying there's no such thing as society on a macro scale, then what 'society' are you disconnecting from? Why would you not be able to have a society in the wilderness or on the farmland? > If you enjoy what you are doing what difference does it make whether someone is pulling weight or not? Absolutely not! Right up until you expect things which are the products of someone else's labour to be provided for you. 0: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30102349 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30102349 1: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30128236 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30128236