3 ms·
Sure, but the main thing is that if you do ssh -X it does kind of work. I can have one individual window integrated with my normal desktop, from a remote machi
by eternityforest 5y ago
Sure, but the main thing is that if you do ssh -X it does kind of work. I can have one individual window integrated with my normal desktop, from a remote machine. It sucks but it's enough to get a few basic things done.
Wayland should surely be able to at least match that!
Individual pixel buffers should still be faster if only some of them change regularly, right?
- eptcyka 5y agoThis never worked for me. But I agree, there's no reason this functionality couldn't be implemented as an extension protocol to Wayland.
- funcDropShadow 5y agoThis is hard to believe to me, I've used `ssh -X` countless times over the last twenty years on Ubuntu, Debian, Gentoo, Mandrake, Suse, Nixos and whatever else. I cannot remember this did ever fail. It might have been slow. I might have fixed xauth issues at the beginning. But it worked. So I am wondering what you did to have such bad experience.
- eptcyka 5y agoGnome, probably. But also, all the things I'd want to run like this probably wouldn't work - games, video players, browsers and IDE's. Everything else I run from the terminal be it locally or remotely.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- TingPing 5y agowaypipe performs better than x forwarding does.