> This sounds like a dangerous thing to think. Very one-sided and superficial, for sure. > Only when the democratic process of discussion and negotiation fail

> This sounds like a dangerous thing to think. Very one-sided and superficial, for sure. > Only when the democratic process of discussion and negotiation fails does a person have to step in and make a decision. ...or at least force the discussion onto the relevant subjects. One important tool to help the team come to the "right" decision for a project is to provide a vision and associated goals that can be used as a yardstick to evaluate the benefits of each alternative. The "debate" should flow into the same direction.