3 ms·
I think you’ve stopped reading the article too soon. If anything, the article says the opposite. TED has been an amazing success, just not in the way we think o
by camillomiller 5y ago
I think you’ve stopped reading the article too soon. If anything, the article says the opposite. TED has been an amazing success, just not in the way we think of it.
>> TED of course can’t be held solely responsible for the increasingly eschatological pronouncements of this cohort [the tech elite]. That would be, in a way, to buy into its hype too much. But as the most visible and influential public speaking platform of the first two decades of the twenty-first century, it has been deeply implicated in broadcasting and championing the Silicon Valley version of the future. TED is probably best understood as the propaganda arm of an ascendant technocracy. It helped refine prediction into a rhetorical art well-suited to these aspiring world conquerors — even the ones who fail.
- smnrchrds 5y agoYou are right. I read the first part and added the article to my reading list to finish later. But the conclusions of the first part mirror how I personally feel about TED.
- JohnJamesRambo 5y agoWait, is that supposed to be uplifting? The Silicon Valley version of the future has turned out to be a dystopian nightmare.
- fknorangesite 5y agoNo, it is not. It is supposed to point out that TED has succeeded at its actual purpose - just not the purpose we were led to believe.
- JohnJamesRambo 5y agoAh I see. Yes I’d agree with that.
- ImaCake 5y agoI stopped before this point. Thankyou heaps for reading further and sharing this quote. I think it really nails it.