> Even the majority prohibiting something would still be democratic. The vast majority of people use the services that a vocal few object to. We have already h

> Even the majority prohibiting something would still be democratic. The vast majority of people use the services that a vocal few object to. We have already had a vote (implicitly) and we know where the will of the people lies. But there are people who believe the government should unilaterally overrule this because they believe they know what's best for them. That is absolutely undemocratic. > Wanting others to live healthier lives and saying that aloud has nothing to do with any form of government at all. I don't need to live in a dictatorship to talk about the dangers of alcohol, obesity, or facebook. Which of course is a complete strawman and not at all what I said, or claimed was ocurring.