2 ms·
> "no fault" "No blame" No fault is what we want to achieve. Also we need to maintain liability of the managers deciding to not do certain measures, for cost
by froh 5y ago
> "no fault"
"No blame"
No fault is what we want to achieve.
Also we need to maintain liability of the managers deciding to not do certain measures, for cost reasons.
It's perfectly fine to invent MCAS, to maintain 737 "look and feel" to the pilot. It's not okay to not introduce it properly. It's not okay to only think about MCAS failure modes, symptoms and remedies after the fact. It's not okay to make the business decision (!) To not thoroughly train for potential failure.
There has to be liability at the decision making level.
- rramadass 5y agoThis is exactly right. I am not sure why Walter is trying to excuse Boeing of the consequences of their actions. They made a series of very wrong decisions in the name of "profit" which cumulatively led to the disaster. They need to be held fully accountable.