3 ms·
Yes. That’s exactly why you want a system where the means are not there to institute tyranny, and there is a separation of power where multiple powerful hierarc
by asabjorn 5y ago
Yes. That’s exactly why you want a system where the means are not there to institute tyranny, and there is a separation of power where multiple powerful hierarchies check each other.
My point isn’t that some of this can’t be done now, but that this tech is a force multiplier as evidenced with how China use this kind of tech for social control
Systems like this that are marketed assuming an enlightened selfless group control it fails to take human nature into account. It never worked before and with the means we have no it will fail spectacularly.
Certainly the WEF and it’s Young Global Leaders haven’t shown selfless restraint so far. Eg Boris Johnson, Trudeau, Markel all were caught partying while forcing everyone else to do the opposite. They all become wealthy while in power.