That's not what sealioning means. I'm asking for data for the one central assertion you made, and you are unable to provide it. Typing out increasingly waffling

That's not what sealioning means. I'm asking for data for the one central assertion you made, and you are unable to provide it. Typing out increasingly waffling and verbose answers without providing that data, making yet more assertions you have no evidence for, and linking papers and data which do not answer the original question is the problem here. You can't just cry "sealioning" after you make unsubstantiated claims and refuse to provide evidence for them. > Correct. This is a public internet forum where private or restricted access sources are not shareable, not an open science conference. Very convenient you just brought that up only after several back and forth posts that showed you were unable to substantiate your claim with actual data. You can see why I don't believe you. > For any reading this comment chain who may be confused -- vaccinations reduce community spread, the evidence has been provided in the comment linked, and I encourage you to strongly distrust when people are "just asking questions." Evidence was not provided. If evidence was provided, then you wouldn't be talking about these non-public sources of evidence you claim to be privy to, would you? They would be irrelevant because you would be able to just provide the evidence. Your story has fallen apart badly. It's clearly pointless to keep beating a dead horse here and obviously you're not the type to ever admit they're wrong. Just keep it in mind for next time and stop yourself from spreading misinformation.