3 ms·
I think (although I might be mistaken) you mean "too expensive" rather than "over priced", the later implies that you thought you didn't get value for money whi
by ig1 15y ago
I think (although I might be mistaken) you mean "too expensive" rather than "over priced", the later implies that you thought you didn't get value for money while the prior covers the case where the cost was just outside of your budget range without taking a position on the value delivered.
- solo960 15y agoGood point, it is an important distinction to be made but I did mean over priced. One company charged me (ripped me off) $500 for 3 "unique" logo and business card concepts. They had a very good rating and feedback on the site and looked trustworthy. I paid them, 4 hours later they provided me 3 stock images (which I traced to iStock) with my contact info on it. The stock images they used were also totally unrelated and generic. When I complained the response I got was "You paid for 3 concepts and we delivered." So I emailed the CEO of the company and it turns out the guy I was dealing with was the CEO! Lessons to be learned.
- iamjonlee 15y agoOne lesson I learned form my hunt for logo designers was to hire by hour. Maybe coincidental, but I tend to hire freelance designers from Europe at hourly rates of $30-$70. While I did encounter mix results, all the design work was still considered very high quality. For 5 basic concepts, it ran me around 7 hours, after which adding another 5 hours for coloring, textures, shadow, typography comes out to be around $500-$700. For 3 "unique" logo and business card concepts, it seems too good to be true. Sorry about your bad experience, better luck next time!