3 ms·
Effectively, yes. Remote learning is a poor substitute for in-person instruction particularly in the primary grades.
by throwawayboise 5y ago
Effectively, yes. Remote learning is a poor substitute for in-person instruction particularly in the primary grades.
- irrational 5y agoThat isn't what teachers I have talked to have said. Though, it depends on the student. Every teacher has told me that there are certain students that were doing terrible in in-person school, but came alive and excelled beyond all expectations during remote learning. One teacher related that she saw one of the students after in-person schooling started again and that student had reverted to failing at everything. In-person is good for some people, remote is good for some people. The problem is we want a solution that fits everyone and don't want to acknowledge that different people have different needs.