3 ms·

That's interesting that you mention side effects, because I've heard it represented as being one of the safest medicines ever made. Can you back that up with s

That's interesting that you mention side effects, because I've heard it represented as being one of the safest medicines ever made. Can you back that up with some proof...Vaers reports? CDC is US based. I have read before that it was approved for use in Japan for treatment. So there must be some disagreement between health agencies on it's effectiveness.

shadowgovt 5y ago
> VAERS reports? ... Aren't proof. VAERS is data collection, not analysis. It's a giant anecdote database. There is no vetting on the input data, which is self-reported. There is a VAERS entry describing someone being turned into the Incredible Hulk after taking MMR vaccine. https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=221579&WAYBACKHISTORY=ON https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=221... Fortunately, there are tests and analytics on the side-effects of Ivermectin that don't rely on VAERS. You can find most of them listed in the FDA front-matter for the drug, because it was approved for other uses besides COVID. The approval process includes grasping side-effects. The US decided, ages ago, that "snake-oil" (unproven drugs with side-effects) were something the government would step in and stop because people suffering and dying are desperate and easily-cheated. Other nations have different histories. (... Regarding Japan, I'd double check primary sources. https://www.newswise.com/articles/misleading-reuters-article-further-muddies-ivermectin-debate-wire-agency-issues-correction https://www.newswise.com/articles/misleading-reuters-article...)