3 ms·

> That was the missle defense system. You seem to be talking about the 'nuclear sharing treaty' which will probably retreat from Turkeye as relations aren't as

> That was the missle defense system. You seem to be talking about the 'nuclear sharing treaty' which will probably retreat from Turkeye as relations aren't as they were. > I said trade preferrable with democracies. > US are friends. Discussing about things is part of international diplomacy. If you want to go back, you just need to check WW2. They are a lot of joint missions were we support the US and vica versa. I'm not saying it's perfect, since that's not possible in reality. The one who is not friends, is the one that kills ( + attempts to kill) people in a EU country with Plutonium as a deterrent for others - https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1038914/ https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1038914/ ( must watch actually) > Ofc Russia has something against EU. EU has gone without war within 80 miles of Moscow. That's exactly what Russia hates and wants to deter, additionally Ukraine is very close to Russia and would be a giant PITA for their naval fleet. Those things have nothing to do with US relations, but has everything todo with countries favoring the EU over Russia. > Mentioned because it probably IS Russia. I didn't claim it's a certainty. But that's Russia's problem, since they are the main agressor in cyber threats in almost all confirmed cases. One of the possible defenses against malware is literally installing the "Russian language/crylic keyboard" - https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2021/05/adding-a-russian-keyboard-to-protect-against-ransomware.html https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2021/05/adding-a-russ... "Probable" false flag isn't what that means. It's probably just like in almost all other cases. A Russian cyber-agressor concerning malware. I'm not going to post here in 1-2 months when we know it for a fact. PS. I'm curious about where you're from? I already mentioned myselve being a member of the EU ( fyi: Belgium) - ( I'm actually curious where your resentment comes from and have some underlying context )

nix23 5y ago
Look i stop here you twist facts until it's a moebius loop. >kills ( + attempts to kill) people in a EU country with Plutonium as a deterrent for others Yeah traitors(for russians)....the US makes that even with NON-US Citizens (Assange), and alleged terrorist without a court case on cuban ground because it would be illegal on US-ground (Guantanamo), again you tell everyone how bad one side is but completely leave out the criticizing party...bit shameful no? And hey let's not start with that pile of shit Belgian-History (and present) is. > I'm actually curious where your resentment comes It's not resentment, but i hate false/fake-news and propaganda and especially if history gets twisted to have a good argument like you do (the US good friends in WW2 but completely forgets about Russia...it's disgusting TBH) Switzerland
- NicoJuicy 5y ago
  US didn't kill Assange obviously. He's also not extradicted yet and not in the US. He is in prison for leaking US governement secrets ( but outside the US), those things are still illegal fyi. It was clearly known for him from the start that it could have a huge impact. Being in the election against Putin and be poisoned by Plutonium because of just that, is obviously multiple levels worse. Eg. US literally had multiple planes bombarding their country for terrorism as a direct cause of many things. Russia was also under direct attack of Germany. It was in their benefit to deter Germany, US/Canada was not under attack. What would be the current shit show of Belgium? Talking about 200 years ago as an argument is clear whataboutism. I don't blame anything on current Germany either ( and we have joint memorials in Ypres for example), but if you look at current attempts of what you're talking about and try to blame. You should again check what Russia is doing today ( and not 200 years ago).
  - nix23 5y ago
    >He is in prison for leaking US governement secrets ( but outside the US), those things are still illegal fyi No it's not, i can leak any secret from another country, there is no law that forbids leaking secrets from other countrys (good journalism would be otherwise impossible)...again you try to be smart but instead you are uneducated. >What would be the current shit show of Belgium? https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34810155 https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34810155 https://sofrep.com/news/belgian-commandos-in-africa-secretive-and-highly-effective/ https://sofrep.com/news/belgian-commandos-in-africa-secretiv... Funny eh? And worst of all...your chocolate sucks!
    - NicoJuicy 5y ago
      Before you call me uneducated. There seems to be a lot of very basic ( and known) concepts that you don't seem to understand? Let me educate you a bit, perhaps you can connect the dots ( correctly) this time: 1) Espionage act of 1917 => illegal to spread confidential information. 2) Extradition => laws between countries for requesting prisoners or asking for their arrest. 3) Journalist are protected under "press freedom". They do need to redact sensitive information which Assange didn't do. You are correct that good journalism isn't possible without 'Press freedom' and 'Press freedom' does not exist in Russia for example. > About Belgium: You're literally talking about the embargo that was lifted in good faith ( and that was abused by Libya though), so a legit sale and a controlled training environment (mentioned in the article)? Lol. What a whataboutism ( again) Ps. I only sell Belgian beers online, to answer another whataboutism and weak attempt to a personal attack. Not many of your points seem to remain though. Bonne chance autrement.

nix23 5y ago

Look i stop here you twist facts until it's a moebius loop. >kills ( + attempts to kill) people in a EU country with Plutonium as a deterrent for others Yeah traitors(for russians)....the US makes that even with NON-US Citizens (Assange), and alleged terrorist without a court case on cuban ground because it would be illegal on US-ground (Guantanamo), again you tell everyone how bad one side is but completely leave out the criticizing party...bit shameful no? And hey let's not start with that pile of shit Belgian-History (and present) is. > I'm actually curious where your resentment comes It's not resentment, but i hate false/fake-news and propaganda and especially if history gets twisted to have a good argument like you do (the US good friends in WW2 but completely forgets about Russia...it's disgusting TBH) Switzerland

NicoJuicy 5y ago
US didn't kill Assange obviously. He's also not extradicted yet and not in the US. He is in prison for leaking US governement secrets ( but outside the US), those things are still illegal fyi. It was clearly known for him from the start that it could have a huge impact. Being in the election against Putin and be poisoned by Plutonium because of just that, is obviously multiple levels worse. Eg. US literally had multiple planes bombarding their country for terrorism as a direct cause of many things. Russia was also under direct attack of Germany. It was in their benefit to deter Germany, US/Canada was not under attack. What would be the current shit show of Belgium? Talking about 200 years ago as an argument is clear whataboutism. I don't blame anything on current Germany either ( and we have joint memorials in Ypres for example), but if you look at current attempts of what you're talking about and try to blame. You should again check what Russia is doing today ( and not 200 years ago).
- nix23 5y ago
  >He is in prison for leaking US governement secrets ( but outside the US), those things are still illegal fyi No it's not, i can leak any secret from another country, there is no law that forbids leaking secrets from other countrys (good journalism would be otherwise impossible)...again you try to be smart but instead you are uneducated. >What would be the current shit show of Belgium? https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34810155 https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34810155 https://sofrep.com/news/belgian-commandos-in-africa-secretive-and-highly-effective/ https://sofrep.com/news/belgian-commandos-in-africa-secretiv... Funny eh? And worst of all...your chocolate sucks!
  - NicoJuicy 5y ago
    Before you call me uneducated. There seems to be a lot of very basic ( and known) concepts that you don't seem to understand? Let me educate you a bit, perhaps you can connect the dots ( correctly) this time: 1) Espionage act of 1917 => illegal to spread confidential information. 2) Extradition => laws between countries for requesting prisoners or asking for their arrest. 3) Journalist are protected under "press freedom". They do need to redact sensitive information which Assange didn't do. You are correct that good journalism isn't possible without 'Press freedom' and 'Press freedom' does not exist in Russia for example. > About Belgium: You're literally talking about the embargo that was lifted in good faith ( and that was abused by Libya though), so a legit sale and a controlled training environment (mentioned in the article)? Lol. What a whataboutism ( again) Ps. I only sell Belgian beers online, to answer another whataboutism and weak attempt to a personal attack. Not many of your points seem to remain though. Bonne chance autrement.