4 ms·
Meanwhile the former pope and his bishop protected known child abusers who continued to abuse children. Aiding a criminal is itself a crime in Germany -- I wou
by benjamir 5y ago
Meanwhile the former pope and his bishop protected known child abusers who continued to abuse children.
Aiding a criminal is itself a crime in Germany -- I would go for "Täterschaft durch Unterlassen"; without their enablement, no further abuse could have happened.
But the prosecutors seem to be to involved with the church shrug
Instead of going for the known abusers the general population gets the STASI 3.x treatment.
Some days I wish the EU dissolves into irrelevancy. Barely more than a fishbowl full off awkward, self righteous bureaucrats.
Then again, the scavengers and populists are already waiting and are the guaranteed ticket to hell during lifetime.
- pessimizer 5y agoThat's just how things happen. In the US, we filled a database with the DNA of everyone arrested for (not convicted of) any slightly serious crime, and justified it by the search for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_James_DeAngelo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_James_DeAngelo, who of course turned out to be a cop who wasn't subject to DNA collection. The internet is a distraction. Meet with people face-to-face, until the switch is flipped that tracks and monitors that, too.
- aftbit 5y ago>who of course turned out to be a cop who wasn't subject to DNA collection. He was fired as a cop for shoplifting (according to wikipedia) so why wasn't his DNA collected then?