3 ms·

> No, Im not okay with risking killing people. I was clear that i believe human life > property. Im ok with damaging empty police stations though. No you don't

> No, Im not okay with risking killing people. I was clear that i believe human life > property. Im ok with damaging empty police stations though. No you don't, you are okay with risking killing people. How did these protester know the police station was empty? They didn't. You condone violence. > You're placing a higher value on property than on human (black) life. Liar, these molotov cocktails were not thrown at buildings ,in a attempt at arson, for the sake of black people. And don't make it about black people, like all that violence was for the sake of black people, it wasn't, it was for the sake of violent individuals who clearly didn't care about the consequences of their actions, actions you condone. Don't use black people as a shield for your violent ideology.

pydry 5y ago
>No you don't, you are okay with risking killing people This is literally and precisely what I am against. >And don't make it about black people It is about the correct response to people who get away with literal murder. >like all that violence was for the sake of black people Or for murdered people who did not receive justice. >clearly didn't care about the consequences of their actions, actions you condone. This is precisely the problem. What are the consequences if a cop murders someone and gets off? If the state does not ensure consequences for the guilty then is the state not guilty? And if the state is guilty, what should its punishment be?