There has to be protections for minorities defined as people having minority view points. Otherwise there is tyranny of the majority. A democracy protects the r

There has to be protections for minorities defined as people having minority view points. Otherwise there is tyranny of the majority. A democracy protects the rights of minorities which includes preserving their speech. That may mean allowing opposing viewpoints to take root. If the majority wants the government to outlaw and ban opposing viewpoints or speech I think that although that is the government doing the will of the people, that is undemocratic. To tie that to what the OP post is about, it mentions censorship that goes beyond what the stated purpose of the law is. I think most here are aware that that is probably intentional.