No offense but you and the people downvoting me don't seem to understand blockchains very well. If TPS is all that matters then there would be no need for a blo

No offense but you and the people downvoting me don't seem to understand blockchains very well. If TPS is all that matters then there would be no need for a blockchain, just use a traditional database. As someone who's been in the blockchain space for 8 years I've seen numerous scamcoins become popular because they lure people in with claims of high TPS. High TPS isn't actually that hard of a problem. High TPS with decentralization and security IS hard. Case-in-point, blockchains like Bitcoin and Ethereum limit TPS on purpose specifically because they care about decentralization. After all, that's the whole point of a blockchain. I would encourage you and the people downvoting to read up on a few things. 1) The blockchain trilemma. 2) Why Bitcoin and Ethereum limit transaction speed and block size. 3) Layer 2 Rollups (zkRollups) that offer an actual solution to transaction speeds without sacrificing decentralization. In summary, my point is that judging a blockchain by the standards of a traditional database is like judging a traditional database by the standards of a filesystem. Sure they both store data and yes a filesystem might store data faster but there are other constraints that make them fundamentally different (like ACID transactions).