strangely relevant: http://venturebeat.com/2011/09/21/video-blogging-vs-traditional-journalism/ http://venturebeat.com/2011/09/21/video-blogging-vs-traditio...

strangely relevant: http://venturebeat.com/2011/09/21/video-blogging-vs-traditional-journalism/ http://venturebeat.com/2011/09/21/video-blogging-vs-traditio... a rambling video chat that seemed done more to get a chance to promote the videoconference sponsor than because anyone had anything to actually say. No mention whatsoever of journalism or how it differs from just writing. The closest they got was one mention (by the author of the piece this thread is about) of how nice it is to not have to deal with that annoying fact checking thing like he did at reuters.