>Race is a protected class. Good, then you aconowledge that discrimination on this characteristic was an act of force requiring explicit protections to be impl

>Race is a protected class. Good, then you aconowledge that discrimination on this characteristic was an act of force requiring explicit protections to be implemented to cease the practice? The poster is making the assertion that the same underlying pattern of behavior is unfolding, and your interpretation of it not being an act of force requires that your definition of "force" be so out of touch with the reality/form of life that they are invoking under the pre-supposition you both can come to an agreement on a dictionary referenced definition of the word, as to be uselessly undermined by arbitrary political distortions so as to be useless to continue trying to communicate. This is not a good sign; for anyone involved; I might add.