From the opposite point of view, many people consider themselves lucky that coworkers who decided to opt out are expelled/fired. The focus should be on whether

From the opposite point of view, many people consider themselves lucky that coworkers who decided to opt out are expelled/fired. The focus should be on whether a given imposition has a net positive for society or not, rather than the imposition itself. I actually find it very indicative that the root comment's conclusion is entirely about the ROI for the individual. It's fair to judge that not boosting doesn't have any net positive for society, but that discussion should be the focus.