Fire can kill and seriously injure people. If this kind of weapon does not justify a warrant, what does? I can see making a case that nothing justifies it, as

Fire can kill and seriously injure people. If this kind of weapon does not justify a warrant, what does? I can see making a case that nothing justifies it, as a principle, but not sure I agree that Molotov cocktail is just a harmless toy idea. > These are very marginal actors doing something that can't really cause large scale damage Just curious how would we know that? It’s nice if it was true, of course, but is it?