Reading an article written in such a way as to cause needless flamewars makes me angry. The article is a borderline opinion piece. For instance: > While some t

Reading an article written in such a way as to cause needless flamewars makes me angry. The article is a borderline opinion piece. For instance: > While some towns saw significant property damage in the wake of the Jacob Blake protests, all evidence shows the attack against the Seattle union building was ineffective and notable mostly as an affront to local police. The writer is expressing on opinion that the attack wasn't that bad and didn't justify this kind of warrant- not that the warrant should never be used-- just not used to investigate activity related to BLM activity. There is no mention as to the legality of throwing fire bombs at buildings or comment on the justification actually used in the warrant.