> The susceptibility of these systems to completely failing on weird inputs ... If you believe that people are "general intelligence" systems, then your commen

> The susceptibility of these systems to completely failing on weird inputs ... If you believe that people are "general intelligence" systems, then your comment doesn't imply that the existing artificial systems won't achieve general intelligence, because people fail massively on weird inputs. Consider optical illusions: https://newatlas.com/science/best-optical-illusions-year-2021-contest-winner/ https://newatlas.com/science/best-optical-illusions-year-202... Consider audio illusions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKR2pGwavqE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKR2pGwavqE Consider tactile illusions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdhnEq76_PA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdhnEq76_PA * Machines fail on weird inputs, therefore they will never be intelligent; * People fail on weird inputs, therefore they cannot be intelligent.