>I don't even understand why a company would decide to build a boat in a location where it's impossible to transport it from there to the sea. It’s obviously n

>I don't even understand why a company would decide to build a boat in a location where it's impossible to transport it from there to the sea. It’s obviously not impossible to transport the boat to the sea. > This seems far more sensible than removing a bridge. Opening up the bridge is trivial, just look at it. There’s little chance they won’t open it up, as that’d just screw the local industry by placing a permanent limit on what they can build inland of the bridge. Instead they will most likely find a reasonable solution to safely and quickly dismantle the bridge and put it back together. This isn’t a hard problem to solve, and a lot of money is at stake.