> The money itself will not lose its value because you've tainted it with sin--you'll just likely be caught if you spend too much of it at once. So how is this

> The money itself will not lose its value because you've tainted it with sin--you'll just likely be caught if you spend too much of it at once. So how is this different from, say, using a tumbler? The crux of TFA's argument is that Bitcoin is tainted with sin.