3 ms·
Why don't you just censor it then? That's what you'd prefer, right? You don't know how to think, so you cannot handle something that differs from what's already
by graderjs 5y ago
Why don't you just censor it then? That's what you'd prefer, right? You don't know how to think, so you cannot handle something that differs from what's already in your head, so you want it to be silenced. This is because you've engaged the culture in a "consumerist" way, so you're not thinking critically.
What is "offensive"? It's a personal reaction. So, as single-basis for morality, is a non-starter. Incredibly seriously, the only one who is incredibly wrong here is you, by pretending your emotional reaction constitutes a moral reality. It's incredibly wrong to think you can fake-justify limiting people's freedoms because of your own emotions.
The second point is you can't use the memory of Nazi victims as a stick to beat others with or to try to silence them. That's an abuse of the victims, and an abomination. It is good to have this Wiki quote here as a reminder or what happened, and how they didn't really see the signs. Just like now, this is not the first step--I agree--and yet people, now, like then, are not seeing the signs of what this will be. He's not cancelled yet. Canceling Joe will be the West's Free speech Kristallnacht.