4 ms·
These explanations fail to explain the Avalon Explosion, which was the immediate precursor to the Cambrian Explosion, starting 575 million years ago, roughly 34
by lkrubner 5y ago
These explanations fail to explain the Avalon Explosion, which was the immediate precursor to the Cambrian Explosion, starting 575 million years ago, roughly 34 million years before the Cambrian:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avalon_explosion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avalon_explosion
The late portion of the Avalon is, arguably, the first phase of the Cambrian, especially after 550 million years ago. This is still under intense discussion.
Theories like "Maybe it was rising oxygen" fail to map to the complex interplay of development that we can see happening at the end of Ediacaran/Avalon-start-of-the-Cambrian.
A better explanation, which might appeal to computer programmers: sometimes you can't do work in a low level language. Sometimes, to do complex work, you need to switch to a high level language. And that is exactly what happened at the end of the Avalon. While you can say "DNA is the language life" what's crucial is the emergence of a powerful new DSL for describing complex body shapes: the Hox genes.
Consider the 3 earliest splits in the animal Kingdom, all happening at the end of the Ediacaran/Avalon:
sponges
Ctenophora
Bilateria
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilateria https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilateria
The first 2 don't have real Hox genes, but all of the Bilateria do, and when we talk about the Cambrian Explosion, we are talking about the explosion of Bilateria.
So we should consider the possibility that the Cambrian Explosion was an innovation in language, a specialization of DNA, the Hox genes essentially offering a specialized language for the description of complex body types. Remember that fish, flies, and humans all have Hox genes, and biology grads getting their PhDs take a certain perverse delight in showing that eyes can be made to appear in many different locations on a fly, by manipulating the Hox genes in the fly eggs.
As an analogy, consider how Alfred North Whitehead, back in 1912, described the benefits of a great math notation:
"By relieving the brain of all unnecessary work, a good notation sets it free to concentrate on more advanced problems, and in effect increases the mental power of the race."
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Alfred_North_Whitehead https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Alfred_North_Whitehead
It is possible that describing complex body types was simply too much work without the Hox genes, but the Hox genes allowed a simplification, perhaps less actual work for the cells as they reproduced?
- wolverine876 5y agoDo you happen to know any serious science sources that discuss the Avalon Explosion?
- lkrubner 5y agoYou can start with the references that are listed at the bottom of the Wikipedia page, listed above. I’ll try to post more when I’m back at my regular computer.
- mncharity 5y ago> A better explanation, which might appeal to computer programmers [...] a powerful new DSL for describing complex body shapes: the Hox genes In a similar vein, a talk some years back, IIRC, suggested step-function-like expansions of miRNA repertoires (conserved regulatory small RNA families) at important phylogenetic tree branchings, was fruitfully viewed as "ok, now we have the knobs and dials to take on a new level of metabolic and morphological system complexity". Sort of vaguely like watching an SPA website's js bundle expand - "ok, looks like it's picked up a reactive programming library, oh, and now it has components, ...". I wondered if it might fruitfully be used as a theme, to rearrange how the phylogenetic tree is taught to kids. Perhaps gaining a clarity from lower-cardinality deep structure, that's less accessible in sea-of-features detail and stamp collecting.