3 ms·
I'm assuming you're referring to the CAN-SPAM Act [1] or equivalent in other jurisdiction [2], but nothing of the sort is implied. The requirement is to make av
by pishpash 5y ago
I'm assuming you're referring to the CAN-SPAM Act [1] or equivalent in other jurisdiction [2], but nothing of the sort is implied. The requirement is to make available and process opt-out without charge and promptly (typically in so many days).
It is neither dire nor prevents clarification, nor prescribes a specific experience related to unsubscribe links. It's odd to hear the only options are between receiving messages and having service terminated. That sounds pretty user-hostile tbh.
[1] https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/business-center/guidance/can-spam-act-compliance-guide-business https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/business-center/guidance/can...
[2] https://www.lsoft.com/resources/optinlaws.asp https://www.lsoft.com/resources/optinlaws.asp
- onli 5y agoOh, interesting! https://www.rapidmail.de/blog/welche-vorgaben-gelten-bei-der-dsgvo-konformen-newsletter-abmeldung#abmeldelink https://www.rapidmail.de/blog/welche-vorgaben-gelten-bei-der... claims the same for Germany. That makes it a bit easier to find a solution.