Yes, pretending the raw statistical chance in any way speaks to whether discrimination occurred is absurd and can be summarily dismissed. The issue could be dis

Yes, pretending the raw statistical chance in any way speaks to whether discrimination occurred is absurd and can be summarily dismissed. The issue could be discrimination, but sour grapes type comments like this don't add to the case. Edit: I read your comment before reading the article. She's a math professor. That's even worse I would argue because she should know better. I had assumed she was in some nontechnical area and didn't understand statistics.